UPDATE: See bottom of the post.
In the comments section of my original post, "No Christmas at Willow Creek", Andy writes:
I may be wrong but thought the Sunday service at Willow Creek was a seeker service and that believers attended a midweek service. It doesn't make sense to me to hold a seeker service on Christmas as most prechristians are busy with Santa and other festivities that day. I hope they are not cancelling their midweek services during the Christmas season.
I thought about this after reading some of the comments over at Shane's post on the same subject. Some may believe that Willow Creek's wrong is mitigated somewhat by their non-typical worship schedule. Others may conclude that they didn't cancel their "main" service". Now, many may reject their seeker-sensitive model or find major faults with it. But the fact is, normal worship for active (believers) members occurs on days other than Sunday under the Willow Creek model.
But in fact, this may make Willow Creek's decision even worse. If the Sunday service is the one normally reserved for seeker-sensitives (and in fact this is the service that non-believers are invited to attend) isn't this the one service that shouldn't be cancelled for any reason?!? Especially for Christmas, a time when people often become more contemplative and are more spiritually minded. Particularly as we struggle through a season of vapid commercialism that has almost stripped Christmas of its meaning?
In the year 2005, I blogged about three events where church services were either cancelled or discontinued for some reason. The first is Hurricane Katrina. Here in the Mississippi Conference, churches were destroyed. Our conference is paying the salaries of pastors who do not even have church buildings to preach in the destruction was so severe. The second is the tragedy at University Baptist Church, where a pastor was electrocuted during a baptismal service. And the third is the cancellation of worship due to Christmas.
Which two seem pretty defensible?
Update: Ann Althouse points to this article in the New York Times and asks a very good question:
And what about the people who don't have families and might have needed that service to have a warm connection to other human beings on Christmas?
Rumor has it a certain church in Starkville (not mine) is closing church on Christmas too. While it isn't a megachurch, it is the largest church in the county. I'm trying to find out if it is true.
Update: Apparently, the rumor isn't true, or, if it was, it isn't now.
